2003年9月26日 Lutzkie NO and Another v Zenith Concessions Ltd (386/2002) [2003] ZASCA 97 (26 September 2003) Download original files. PDF format. RTF format. THE
MoreFebruary 2003. S v Kock (670/02) [2003] ZASCA 1; [2003] 1 All SA 551 (SCA) (14 February 2003) S v Jimenez (73/2002) [2003] ZASCA 2; [2003] 1 All SA 535 (SCA) (21 February
MoreLutzkie v Zenith Concessions Ltd 2003 (6) SA 643 (SCA). In the present case the underlying debt was a contract for the sale of shares in a company for which the
More3 Froman v Robertson 1971 (1) SA 115 (A) at 120F-G; Lutzkie another NNO v Zenith Concessions Ltd 2003 (6) SA 643 (SCA) para 6. 4 Ibid. 5 Above, fn 3. 7
More2019年8月8日 In Shaw v Tati Concessions Ltd [9] one factional interest commanded 58,000 shares and the other 99,000 shares. However, shortly before the poll was to be
More2020年1月27日 Category: Judgments 2003. Order Files by: Default Name Author Date Hits. Files: Bock and others v Duburoro Investments (Pty) Ltd 228/02. ... Neutral
MoreLutzkie NO and Another v Zenith Concessions Ltd (386/2002) [2003] ZASCA 97 (26 September 2003) 26 September 2003 Minister of Safety and Security v Hamilton
More150 THE MODERN LAW REVIEW [Vol. 41 came to be accepted. It is arguable that much of our present difficulty stems from the fact that MacDougall v. Gardiner and a number of
MoreLutzkie v Zenith Concessions Ltd 2003 (6) SA 643 (SCA). In the present case the underlying debt was a contract for the sale of shares in a company for which the
MoreExpand 402 403Part 3 Commentary on the Provisions of the Companies Act 2006, Part 13, Sections 281 to 361
More